GLM-5.2 is now availableLearn more

GLM-5.2 API

Access Z.ai GLM-5.2 through EvoLink for long-horizon coding agents, repo Q&A, and tool-using engineering workflows. Use one EvoLink API key, the request model ID `glm-5.2`, and an OpenAI-compatible route with clear token pricing.
Model Type:

Price: $1.000(~ 68 credits) per 1M input tokens

Highest stability with guaranteed 99.9% uptime. Recommended for production environments.

Use the same API endpoint for all versions. Only the model parameter differs.

GLM-5.2 API

Use Z.ai GLM-5.2 when your agent needs to reason across repositories, tools, and long engineering context. EvoLink gives teams one OpenAI-compatible API route, model ID `glm-5.2`, visible token pricing, and a gateway path that fits existing SDKs and coding-agent stacks.

Access and workflow fit

Best fit

Coding agents

Model ID

glm-5.2

Access

OpenAI-compatible

Context

1M window

Input

$1.00/1M

Built-in

Thinking + tools + caching

Hero showcase of GLM-5.2 API

Where GLM-5.2 fits in production engineering workflows

Long-horizon coding agents

Use GLM-5.2 for agents that need to inspect repository context, explain architectural choices, plan multi-file changes, or review pull requests. EvoLink keeps the integration path OpenAI-compatible, so existing coding CLIs, editor tools, and agent frameworks can usually reuse the same client pattern.

Use-case showcase of GLM-5.2 API coding

Tool-using engineering assistants

Route tool-using assistants through GLM-5.2 when they need to combine reasoning, function calling, retrieval, tests, or internal APIs. EvoLink keeps those calls under one key and one usage surface, which makes agent experiments easier to move toward production.

Use-case showcase of GLM-5.2 API agents

Long-context repo and document analysis

Use the large context window for codebases, specifications, reports, and knowledge bases that are painful to split too aggressively. Stable repository prefixes, system prompts, and project context can also be designed around prompt caching for recurring agent workloads.

Use-case showcase of GLM-5.2 API documents

Why access GLM-5.2 through EvoLink

The model story is long-horizon coding and engineering agents. The EvoLink story is practical access: one key, OpenAI-compatible routing, model ID clarity, pricing visibility, and a gateway layer that avoids another vendor-specific integration.

Fit GLM-5.2 into existing agent stacks

Call GLM-5.2 through an OpenAI-compatible route with one EvoLink key. Existing OpenAI SDK code, coding CLIs, and agent frameworks can usually be adapted by changing the base URL and setting `model` to `glm-5.2`.

Price the agent workload before it scales

Long-running agents can spend heavily on input, output, and repeated context. EvoLink exposes live token pricing for GLM-5.2, including input, output, and cache-read usage, so teams can budget against actual route behavior instead of a vague model description.

Keep route choice and usage visible

GLM-5.2 can be evaluated beside other EvoLink models without rebuilding client integrations. That matters when coding-agent workloads need fallback options, cost checks, and routing decisions over time.

Model comparison

GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

Use this as a practical coding-agent shortlist. Benchmark all three on the same repo Q&A, multi-file refactor, PR review, and tool-calling traces before changing production routes.

ModelBest fitTest against GLM-5.2Routing role
GLM-5.2OpenAI-compatible coding agents, 1M-context repo work, and cost-aware engineering tasks.Full-repo Q&A, long context retention, tool loops, prompt caching, and cost per successful task.Candidate default or cost-aware route for coding-agent workloads.
GPT-5.5OpenAI flagship reasoning and coding workflows with strong SDK and tool ecosystem fit.Hard debugging, architecture review, existing GPT workflows, and premium escalation cases.Premium GPT benchmark or escalation route when failure is expensive.
Claude Opus 4.8Complex reasoning, long-horizon agentic coding, and high-autonomy engineering work.Multi-file refactors, PR review quality, tool-use recovery, and long-running agent sessions.Premium Claude benchmark for the hardest coding-agent traces.

The product page should not declare a universal winner. The useful decision is which route wins on your own engineering traces.

Read the full comparison guide

How to route GLM-5.2 through EvoLink

Start with the access facts that usually break integrations: the exact model ID is `glm-5.2`, the route is OpenAI-compatible, and the live pricing table on this page is the pricing source of truth.

How to route GLM-5.2 through EvoLink
1

Step 1 — Point your client at EvoLink

Create an EvoLink API key, use Bearer auth, and configure your OpenAI-compatible client or agent framework to use the EvoLink base URL.

2

Step 2 — Use the exact model ID

Set `model` to `glm-5.2` in the request body. The page slug is `/glm-5-2`, but production requests should use the dotted model ID.

3

Step 3 — Add tools and context deliberately

Start with a plain chat call, then add repo context, tool schemas, and agent loops in stages. Track input, output, cache-read usage, latency, and retries before moving high-volume coding-agent traffic.

GLM-5.2 model comparison and routing fit

Use this checklist to decide when GLM-5.2 should be the primary coding-agent route, when to compare it against premium coding models, and when to keep cheaper fallbacks in the same gateway.

Best fit

Choose GLM-5.2 when repo context is the bottleneck

GLM-5.2 is positioned for coding agents and complex engineering workflows where the model must hold long context, plan across multiple steps, and reason about code or tools beyond a single prompt.

Compare

Compare it with premium coding models

Evaluate GLM-5.2 beside GPT, Claude, Gemini, or other coding-capable routes for your own PR review, repo Q&A, and agent tasks. EvoLink keeps the client path, usage view, and pricing comparison in one place.

Cost fit

Keep cheaper fallbacks for simple work

Do not route every request to a long-context reasoning model. Simple classification, formatting, and short edits can use lower-cost routes while GLM-5.2 handles harder coding-agent or long-context jobs.

Context

~1M context window

The large context window is useful for repository summaries, specs, logs, or long documents. Use it intentionally: full-context prompts are powerful, but token cost still scales with usage.

Tools

Tool calling and OpenAI-compatible access

Use structured function calling for assistants that need retrieval tools, internal APIs, test runners, or workflow actions. The OpenAI-compatible path keeps setup familiar for SDKs, CLIs, and agent frameworks.

Pricing

Prompt caching and visible token pricing

Stable system prompts, repository summaries, and repeated prefixes can be designed around cache-read pricing when the workload qualifies. The live table shows input, output, and cache-read prices before scaling traffic.

GLM-5.2 API FAQs

Everything you need to know about the product and billing.

GLM-5.2 pricing on EvoLink starts at about $1.00 per 1M input tokens and $3.50 per 1M output tokens. Cache reads start at about $0.25 per 1M tokens. Use the live pricing table on this page as the source of truth for the active EvoLink route.
GLM-5.2 is a strong fit for long-horizon coding agents, repo Q&A, multi-file code review, tool-using engineering assistants, and long-document analysis where context size, function calling, and repeated prompt cost matter.
GLM-5.2 supports a context window of roughly 1M tokens. Use the live pricing table on this page to estimate the active EvoLink route cost for large-context workloads.
Yes. The EvoLink GLM-5.2 route is positioned around complex reasoning, structured function calling, and prompt caching for repeated prefixes. It is a text model route, not an image, video, or audio model.
Compare it on the workload you actually plan to ship: repo Q&A, multi-file review, coding-agent loops, tool calling, latency, and total token cost. GLM-5.2 is a strong candidate when long context and engineering-agent fit matter, while simpler tasks may be better routed to lower-cost models through the same EvoLink gateway.
Yes. EvoLink exposes GLM-5.2 on an OpenAI-compatible endpoint (/v1/chat/completions). Change the base URL and set the model to glm-5.2 to use the OpenAI SDK or any OpenAI-compatible client.
Usually yes. Because GLM-5.2 speaks the OpenAI Chat Completions API, it fits coding CLIs, editor tools, and agent frameworks that support OpenAI-compatible endpoints. For adjacent setup patterns, see One Gateway for 3 Coding CLIs and Gateway vs Direct APIs.
Use the model enum `glm-5.2` in the request body. EvoLink routes the request through the configured GLM-5.2 provider path behind the unified API gateway.