Gemini Omni coming soonLearn more
Wan collection

Wan API Family

Use one EvoLink API to compare the Wan family across video and image workflows. Choose the right route first, then open pricing, comparison, or production guides when you need route-level detail.

Compare the Wan routes

Use workflow type first: flagship video with editing, cinematic video, daily video, or image generation inside the same family.

RouteBest forModalityWorkflow typeReference controlPricing snapshot
Wan 2.7

Flagship

All-in-one video generation and editing: text-to-video, image-to-video with frame control, multi-character reference video with voice cloning, and instruction-based video editing.VideoFlagship unified video routeUp to 5 reference inputs (images, videos, audio) with identity locking and voice cloning$0.086/s
Wan 2.6

Cinematic tier

Cinematic multi-shot video, reference-video identity continuity, brand campaigns.VideoNewest cinematic video routeText, image, and reference video (wan2.6-r2v)$0.0708/s
Wan 2.5

Workhorse tier

Daily UGC, social feeds, SaaS video features, content volume with predictable unit cost.VideoDaily production video routeText and image inputs (no reference video at this tier)$0.0708/s
Wan Image

Image family sibling

Text-to-image creation and image-to-image fusion for batch creative workflows.ImageImage generation and image-to-image fusionText prompts and multi-image fusion inputs$0.0208/image

How to decide which Wan route to use

Follow these 4 rules to narrow down your choice.

1

Start with output type

Video or image? If your workload is image generation, go straight to Wan Image. Otherwise, compare video routes.

2

Then check quality tier

Video editing, reference video with voice cloning, or all four modes in one API — start with Wan 2.7. Cinematic multi-shot storytelling and brand campaigns — start with Wan 2.6. Daily UGC, social feeds, SaaS features — start with Wan 2.5.

3

Then check reference and editing needs

If you need multi-character reference video with voice cloning, or instruction-based video editing, Wan 2.7 is the only option. If you need reference video without editing, Wan 2.6 also supports r2v.

4

Finally, consider iteration speed

For faster image-to-video and reference-video iteration, use Wan 2.6 Flash variants instead of the standard Wan 2.6 tier.

If you already know your workflow type, find the recommended starting point in the table below.

Choose a Wan route by workflow: cinematic, daily video, image, and migration

Match your primary workflow to the right Wan route.

Your workflowRecommended startGood fit if...Watch out for
All-in-one video generation and editingWan 2.7Need text-to-video, image-to-video with frame control, multi-character reference video, and video editing in one APILatest flagship — check if your workflow needs all four modes
Cinematic multi-shot videoWan 2.6Brand campaigns, narrative storytelling, high-end output that needs cinematic qualityHigher per-second cost than Wan 2.5 for standard tier
Reference video continuityWan 2.6 (r2v)Character identity must carry across episodes or scenesReference video has its own input-plus-output duration billing
Daily UGC and social contentWan 2.5Predictable per-second cost, 5 or 10 second social clips, audio outputNo reference video at this tier
Text-to-image and image editingWan ImageBatch creative workflows, campaign banners, product shotsBilled per image, not per second
Faster video iterationWan 2.6 FlashSpeed matters more than peak quality for i2v and r2v loopsFlash variants may trade some quality for speed

Wan API workflows: cinematic video, daily content, reference video, and image generation

See how Wan routes fit into real production pipelines and content workflows.

Video generation and editing in one API

For workflows that need text-to-video, image-to-video with first/last frame control, multi-character reference video with voice cloning, and instruction-based video editing — all through one unified API. Wan 2.7 is the flagship route.

Text-to-video storytelling

For brand campaigns, multi-shot narrative video, and cinematic output. Start with Wan 2.6 for the cinematic tier, or Wan 2.7 for the latest flagship. Use Wan 2.6 Flash for faster iteration when testing concepts before final renders.

Image-to-video production

For turning product images, campaign stills, or concept art into motion. Both Wan 2.6 and Wan 2.5 support image-to-video workflows. Choose by quality tier: Wan 2.6 for cinematic, Wan 2.5 for daily volume.

Reference video and character continuity

For carrying character appearance across episodes, maintaining subject identity in a series, or brand mascot consistency. Wan 2.7 supports multi-character reference video with voice cloning (wan2.7-reference-video), and Wan 2.6 also supports reference video (wan2.6-r2v).

Batch image generation and creative refresh

For text-to-image creation, image-to-image fusion, campaign banners, product shots, and batch creative workflows. Wan Image handles image generation on the same account as Wan video routes.

Explore each Wan route

Use this page to compare, then visit individual route pages for pricing details, playground access, and integration guides.

Access Wan models through one EvoLink API

All Wan routes are available through a single EvoLink API key and async task endpoint. Switch between Wan 2.7, Wan 2.6, Wan 2.5, and Wan Image by changing the model parameter — no separate accounts or keys needed.

Switch model="wan2.7-text-to-video" to model="wan2.6-text-to-video" without rebuilding your integration.
One API key for all Wan routes
Async task pattern for video generation
Switch routes by changing the model parameter
Unified billing and usage visibility

How to think about Wan API cost: cinematic video, daily content, and image generation

Flagship covers all four workflows at $0.083/sec

Wan 2.7 handles text-to-video, image-to-video, reference video with voice cloning, and video editing through one endpoint. If your workflow needs multiple generation modes or editing, Wan 2.7 avoids maintaining separate integrations.

Cinematic quality amplifies per-second cost

Multi-shot storytelling, reference video, and brand campaigns work best with a cinematic tier. If output quality drives business value and you don't need video editing, Wan 2.6 with Flash variants may be the right fit.

Daily volume needs predictable unit cost

UGC pipelines, social content schedules, and SaaS video features generate high call volume. If the bottleneck is cost at scale rather than peak quality, Wan 2.5 keeps per-second cost defensible.

Image tasks use per-image billing

Text-to-image and image-to-image fusion are billed per image, not per second. Multi-image fusion costs the same as single-image generation. Budget separately from video workflows.

Pricing summary

This family page summarizes the pricing shape of the Wan lineup. The route pages own exact live pricing, and the dedicated Wan API pricing guide owns the full price breakdown. The short version: Wan 2.7 is the flagship at $0.083/sec covering all four video workflows, Wan 2.5 and the standard Wan 2.6 tiers share a predictable per-second video rate, Wan 2.6 Flash runs lower for image-to-video and reference-video iteration, and Wan Image is billed per image rather than per second.

Wan 2.7

$0.086/s

Flagship route. $0.083/sec at 720p, 1.67x at 1080p. Covers text-to-video, image-to-video, reference video, and video editing in one endpoint.

Wan 2.6

$0.0708/s

Cinematic tier. Standard per-second rate, plus Wan 2.6 Flash variants and separate reference-video billing logic.

Wan 2.5

$0.0708/s

Daily workhorse tier. Same standard per-second rate, tuned for 5 or 10 second social-style clips with audio output on current routes.

Wan Image

$0.0208/image

Image generation. Billed per image, not per second. Multi-image fusion costs the same as single-image generation.

Related Wan guides

The family page routes users to the right next question, not try to own every Wan intent itself.

Wan API Family FAQ

Everything you need to know about the product and billing.

The Wan API family is EvoLink's grouped access surface for Alibaba Tongyi Wanxiang's Wan video and image models: Wan 2.7 as the flagship with all four video workflows, Wan 2.6 for cinematic multi-shot video, Wan 2.5 for the daily video workhorse tier, and Wan Image for text-to-image and image-to-image. The family page helps developers compare routes and choose the right one without switching providers.
Start with Wan 2.7 if you need all four video workflows (text-to-video, image-to-video, reference video, video editing) or if video editing is part of your pipeline. Start with Wan 2.6 if your workflow is brand campaigns or cinematic multi-shot storytelling with Flash variants. Start with Wan 2.5 for daily content volume where predictable per-second cost matters. Start with Wan Image for image generation rather than video.
Wan 2.7 adds instruction-based video editing and multi-character reference video with voice cloning — neither is available in Wan 2.6. Wan 2.7 also supports first-and-last-frame control in image-to-video mode. Wan 2.6 remains strong for cinematic storytelling with Flash variants for faster iteration. Both run in parallel on EvoLink.
Wan 2.7 runs at $0.083/sec on EvoLink at 720p. Wan 2.5 and the standard Wan 2.6 tiers share a predictable per-second video rate, and Wan 2.6 Flash runs lower than the standard rate for image-to-video and reference-video iteration. Wan Image is billed per image, not per second. For exact numbers, see the Wan API pricing guide.
Yes. EvoLink groups all Wan routes under one account and API key. You can call Wan 2.7, Wan 2.6, Wan 2.6 Flash variants, Wan 2.5, and Wan Image from the same integration, which keeps auth, billing, and async task patterns consistent across the family.
Alibaba open-sourced earlier Wan releases such as Wan 2.1, while Wan 2.5 and Wan 2.6 are documented as API-accessible models on Alibaba's DashScope and Model Studio. Check Alibaba's official announcements for the latest open-source status of each version.