Gemini Omni coming soonLearn more
Claude collection

Claude API Family

Use one EvoLink API to access Claude Fable, Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku routes. Compare pricing, context, output limits, coding-agent fit, and routing value before you choose the right Claude model for each workload.

Compare Claude models: Fable 5, Opus 4.8, Sonnet, and Haiku

Choose based on your primary constraint: maximum capability, strong default quality, cost, context length, output size, or fallback stability.

ModelBest forInput / MTokOutput / MTokContextMax outputSWE-bench
Claude Fable 5

Most Powerful

The hardest coding, longest agent runs, and highest-stakes long-context work where stronger reasoning earns its premium.$10.00$50.001M128K
Claude Opus 4.8

Current Flagship

Complex coding agents, long-context planning, tool-heavy workflows, and high-value reasoning.$5.00$25.001M128K
Claude Opus 4.7

Previous Opus

Stable fallback for teams comparing or migrating hard Opus workloads to Opus 4.8.$5.00$25.001M128K
Claude Opus 4.6

Previous Opus

Previous-generation Opus route for teams migrating premium coding and agent workloads to newer Opus routes.$5.00$25.001M128K80.8%
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Best Balance

Everyday coding, agentic workflows, and extended thinking at balanced cost.$3.00$15.001M128K
High-volume agents, sub-agents, latency-sensitive chat, and free-tier products.$1.00$5.00200K73.3%
Claude Sonnet 4.5

Previous Sonnet

Previous-generation Sonnet route for existing coding and agent workflows.$3.00$15.00200K (1M beta)
Previous-gen flagship with pinned versioned ID for stable production.$5.00$25.00200K64K
Multi-file refactoring, agentic coding, and deep research analysis.$15.00$75.00200K74.5%
Production workloads with 1M context beta for large documents.$3.00$15.00200K (1M beta)

How to decide which Claude model to use

Use these rules to pick a starting model before you wire it into production.

1

Start with task complexity

For most premium Claude workloads, start with Opus 4.8. Escalate to Fable 5 only when the task is frontier-difficulty and the extra reasoning is worth the higher price.

2

Then check cost sensitivity

If you need strong results at lower cost, Sonnet is the safer default. Haiku is the high-volume route for simple tasks.

3

Then check context and output needs

Fable 5, Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7, Opus 4.6, and Sonnet 4.6 support 1M context. Long context still needs retrieval, compaction, and caching discipline.

4

Finally, consider routing

If task difficulty changes inside one workflow, use EvoLink Smart Router instead of hardcoding one Claude model.

Smart Router →

If you already know your task type, find the recommended starting point in the table below.

Which Claude model should you use for coding agents?

Match the primary workflow to the right Claude route before you optimize prompts or fallback policy.

Your taskRecommended startGood fit if...Watch out for
Coding agentsClaude Sonnet, Opus 4.8, or Fable 5You need reliable code generation, review, debugging, and tool-heavy agent behaviorStart with Sonnet for balanced cost, use Opus 4.8 as the strong premium default, and reserve Fable 5 for the hardest repo-scale tasks
Deep reasoning and analysisClaude Opus 4.8 or Fable 5Tasks require extended thinking, multi-step reasoning, or highest-quality outputUse Fable 5 only when Opus 4.8 leaves quality on the table and the request value justifies the top-tier price
High-volume assistants and sub-agentsClaude HaikuTasks are simple, call volume is high, latency mattersNot suited for complex reasoning
Long-context document or codebase analysisClaude Fable 5, Opus 4.8, or Sonnet 4.6You need 1M context for large documents, codebases, or long agent tracesDo not stuff context blindly; measure cost per completed workflow before moving long-context traffic to Fable 5
Mixed text workflowsEvoLink Smart RouterSame workflow has both simple and complex tasksBest when you do not want to maintain manual routing logic

When to use Claude Opus 4.8 instead of Opus 4.7

Use this section as a routing shortcut. The full head-to-head comparison belongs in the Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7 guide.

Use Opus 4.8 for hard agent work

Prioritize 4.8 for long coding sessions, tool-heavy workflows, repo-scale review, and high-value reasoning tasks.

Keep Opus 4.7 as fallback

If a 4.7 workflow is already stable, keep it as a rollback route while you test 4.8 on real traces.

Compare by completed task cost

Same headline price does not mean same production cost. Measure retries, output length, latency, and accepted results.

Claude API workflows

Choose the right Claude model for real production workflows.

Coding agents

Use Sonnet for balanced coding workloads and Opus 4.8 for hard repo-scale agent tasks, review, debugging, and tool-heavy planning.

Long-context document analysis

Use the latest Opus and Sonnet routes for large documents, contracts, research papers, and long codebase traces; keep context discipline to control cost.

Customer support assistants

Use Haiku for high-volume, low-latency support agents. Upgrade to Sonnet or Opus only when the request needs deeper reasoning.

Agent routing and mixed text tasks

For supported text and agent workflows, EvoLink Smart Router can help route simple turns to cheaper models and hard turns to stronger Claude routes.

View Claude model details

Pick a model, then visit its detail page for full capabilities, pricing, and integration.

Access Claude models through one EvoLink API

All Claude models are available through a single EvoLink API key and OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Switch between Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku by changing the model parameter — no separate accounts or keys needed.

One API key for all Claude models
OpenAI-compatible endpoint
Switch models by changing the model parameter
Unified billing and usage visibility

How to think about Claude API cost: reasoning depth, volume, and context

Deep reasoning amplifies output cost

Extended thinking, complex agents, and multi-step analysis produce longer outputs. Use Opus 4.8 when task value is high; use Sonnet or Haiku for simpler work.

High volume favors Haiku

Support bots, sub-agents, and high-call-volume products should start with Haiku, then escalate only the hard turns.

Context length affects input cost

Latest Opus and Sonnet routes support 1M context, but retrieval, compaction, and caching still matter before you default to Opus 4.8.

Pricing summary

All Claude models use per-token pricing. Prompt caching and batch processing may change effective cost. Use each model page for current EvoLink rates and use this family page to choose the right Claude tier.

Fable tier

$10.00 input

$50.00 output

Context: 1M

Top tier — route deliberately for the hardest coding, agent, and long-context tasks where stronger reasoning can justify the premium.

Opus tier

$5.00 input

$25.00 output

Context: 200K–1M

Flagship tier — use for complex reasoning, coding, and agent tasks where quality is the priority.

Sonnet tier

$3.00 input

$15.00 output

Context: 200K–1M

Balanced tier — recommended default for most production workloads at 40% less than Opus.

Haiku tier

$1.00 input

$5.00 output

Context: 200K

Speed tier — 5x cheaper than Opus, ideal for high-volume and latency-sensitive applications.

Related Claude guides

Use this page to compare models, then visit guides for pricing details, comparisons, and integration.

Claude API Family FAQ

Everything you need to know about the product and billing.

The Claude API family on EvoLink includes current Anthropic Claude models such as Fable 5, Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7, Opus 4.6, Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.6, Sonnet 4.5, Sonnet 4.0, and Haiku 4.5. All are accessible through one EvoLink API key and endpoint.
Start with Sonnet 4.6 if you need the best everyday balance of intelligence, speed, and cost. Use Opus 4.8 for most premium coding-agent, reasoning, and long-context tasks. Escalate to Fable 5 only for the hardest workloads where the higher price is justified.
Opus is Anthropic’s flagship tier for the hardest reasoning and coding tasks. Sonnet is the balanced tier for everyday production workloads. In a routing setup, Sonnet is usually the default while Opus 4.8 is the premium route for tasks where answer quality matters most.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the cheapest Claude route in this family table. It is best for high-volume simple tasks, while Sonnet and Opus should be reserved for more complex reasoning or coding work.
Yes. EvoLink provides a single API key and OpenAI-compatible endpoint for Claude models. You can switch between Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku by changing the model parameter, without separate provider accounts or keys.